Can the Objects of an Initial Public Offering (IPO) Be Altered?

An Initial Public Offering (IPO) serves as a significant step for a private company to raise capital from the public by issuing shares. The funds raised through an IPO are typically earmarked for specific purposes, as outlined in the company’s prospectus. However, what happens if the company wishes to change the intended use of the funds after the IPO has been launched? Can the objects for which the money was raised through the IPO be altered? The answer is yes, but there are strict regulations and conditions that govern such changes.

The Legal Framework for Altering Objects of an IPO

The ability of a company to alter the objects of an IPO is addressed in Section 13(8) of the Companies Act, 2013, as well as specific provisions in Rule 32 of the Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014. The legal provisions ensure that the interests of shareholders and investors are protected when such changes are considered. Let's delve deeper into the requirements and the procedure for altering the objects of an IPO.

Section 13(8) of the Companies Act, 2013

According to Section 13(8) of the Companies Act, 2013, a company that has raised money from the public through a prospectus and still has unutilized funds cannot alter the objects for which the money was raised unless certain conditions are met:

1. Passing of a Special Resolution: The company must pass a special resolution in a general meeting to alter the objects for which the money raised via the IPO was intended. This means that the change in objects cannot be made by the board of directors alone, but requires approval from the shareholders of the company.
2. Public Disclosure of the Resolution: After the special resolution is passed, the company is required to publish the details of the resolution in newspapers. The advertisements must be published in one English language newspaper and one in the vernacular language, both of which must be circulated in the region where the company’s registered office is located. This step ensures that shareholders, potential investors, and the general public are informed about the proposed changes.
3. Justification for Change: The company must also provide justification for the alteration in the objects. This transparency ensures that shareholders can understand the rationale behind the shift in objectives, such as new business opportunities or changing market conditions that necessitate a shift in focus.
4. Exit Opportunity for Dissenting Shareholders: The regulation stipulates that dissenting shareholders—those who do not approve of the change in the objects—must be given an opportunity to exit the company. Promoters and shareholders who have control of the company must facilitate this exit in accordance with the guidelines specified by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). This ensures that shareholders who disagree with the decision are not forced to remain invested in the company against their will.

Rule 32 of the Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014

Rule 32 provides further clarity on the process for changing the objects of an IPO after funds have been raised. The rule outlines the specific details that must be included in the notice regarding the resolution to alter the objects:

1. Financial Transparency:
   • Total Money Raised: The notice must state the total amount of money raised through the IPO.
   • Utilization of Funds: It should also indicate how much of the raised money has been utilized for the original objects as stated in the prospectus.
   • Unutilized Funds: The notice must specify the amount of unutilized funds that are available for reallocation.
2. Details of Proposed Alteration: The company must outline the particulars of the proposed changes, explaining the new objects for which the funds will be used.
3. Justification for Alteration: The justification for the proposed change must be clearly articulated. This will help shareholders understand why the original objects are no longer suitable or why new opportunities necessitate the reallocation of funds.
4. Amount for New Objects: The company must specify the amount of money that will be allocated to the new objects and provide an estimate of how these changes might impact the company's financial performance, including expected changes to earnings and cash flow.
5. Additional Relevant Information: Any other relevant information that shareholders would need to make an informed decision about the resolution must also be included.
6. Availability of Resolution Details: The company must inform interested parties about where they can obtain a copy of the notice or resolution, ensuring full transparency.
7. Simultaneous Advertisement: The details of the resolution for altering the IPO objects must be published in an advertisement. This advertisement should be issued at the same time as the dispatch of postal ballot notices to the shareholders.
8. Online Accessibility: In addition to newspaper advertisements, the notice must be placed on the company’s website (if the company has one), ensuring that all shareholders, including those who might not receive the physical copy of the notice, have access to the information.

Implications of Altering IPO Objects

The process of altering the objects of an IPO is not a trivial matter. It involves significant scrutiny and approval processes to ensure that shareholders are adequately informed and that their rights are protected.

1. Shareholder Confidence: If the objects of an IPO are altered, it could potentially impact investor confidence, especially if the reasons for the change are not adequately justified. Investors who were attracted to the company based on its original objectives might view this alteration as a sign of instability or mismanagement.
2. Legal and Regulatory Risks: Companies must ensure strict adherence to the legal procedures outlined above. Failure to comply with these requirements could lead to regulatory scrutiny or legal challenges. In the worst case, shareholders might take legal action against the company if they feel their interests were not adequately protected during the change process.
3. Opportunity for Investors to Exit: The provision for dissenting shareholders to exit the company ensures that those who do not agree with the new direction of the company are not left with their investment against their wishes. This is a safeguard that protects minority shareholders and helps maintain a fair and equitable process.

Conclusion

While the objects of an IPO can be altered, the process is heavily regulated to protect the interests of the shareholders and to maintain the integrity of the capital-raising process. Companies must pass a special resolution, justify the change in objectives, and provide clear, transparent information to shareholders. Dissenting shareholders must also be given an opportunity to exit, ensuring that the alteration does not unduly disadvantage them.

The requirement for detailed disclosures and the provision for shareholder exit demonstrate the importance of maintaining trust and confidence in the financial markets. Altering the objects of an IPO is a significant decision and should be handled with due diligence and transparency to avoid potential legal and regulatory pitfalls. By following the prescribed procedures, companies can make necessary adjustments to their business strategy while safeguarding shareholder interests.

DISCLAIMER: THE CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE PROVIDED BASED ON CURRENT PROVISIONS AND INFORMATION AVAILABLE. WHILE EVERY EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE TO ENSURE ACCURACY AND RELIABILITY, NO RESPONSIBILITY IS ASSUMED FOR ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS. USERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO REFER TO APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. THIS INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS LEGAL ADVICE, AND NO LIABILITY IS ACCEPTED FOR ANY CONSEQUENCES ARISING FROM ITS USE.

From the desk of CS Sharath