Comparative Analysis of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Policies in Asia

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is a critical driver of economic growth, providing countries with capital, technology, and management know-how. Various Asian countries have developed unique policies to attract foreign investors. This article provides a detailed comparison of FDI policies across some of the most favored destinations for investment in Asia: India, Indonesia, Taiwan, Vietnam, China, Bangladesh, Japan, Thailand, Singapore, and the Republic of Korea.

India

Authority: Department of Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade

Regulation: Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA)

India has a well-structured FDI framework governed by FEMA. Investments can be made via two routes:

1. Automatic Route: No prior approval is required.
2. Approval Route: Prior approval from the government is mandatory.

Investors can set up:

• Project offices
• Branch offices
• Liaison offices

Indonesia

Authority: Indonesia Investment Coordinating Board

Regulation: Indonesian Investment Law

In Indonesia, FDI is primarily regulated by the Indonesian Investment Law. Foreign investors can invest through a limited liability company (PT PMA) with a minimum capital of USD 2 lakh.

Taiwan

Authority: Department of Investment Services, Ministry of Economic Affairs

Regulation: Institute for Investment by Foreign Nationals

Taiwan offers two routes for FDI:

1. Direct Investment by Foreign Nationals
2. Investment via Other Foreign Entities

Foreign investors can establish:

• Branch offices
• Subsidiaries

Vietnam

Authority: Ministry of Planning and Investment

Regulation: Law on Investment, 2020

Vietnam's FDI landscape is governed by the Law on Investment (2020). Foreign investments can be made by setting up:

• Limited Liability Companies (LLC)
• Branch offices
• Joint stock companies

China

Authority: Ministry of Commerce

Regulation: Foreign Investment Law

China has a comprehensive FDI policy governed by the Foreign Investment Law. Foreign investments are typically directed towards:

• Chinese funds
• Chinese companies

Bangladesh

Authority: Bangladesh Investment Development Authority

Regulation: Foreign Private Investment (Promotion and Protection) Act, 1980

Bangladesh offers a supportive FDI framework under the 1980 Act. Investors can establish:

• Project offices
• Branch offices
• Liaison offices

Japan

Authority: Ministry of Finance

Regulation: Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act

Japan encourages foreign investment through its Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act. Investors can participate in:

• Japanese stock markets
• Japanese mutual funds

Thailand

Authority: Board of Investment

Regulation: Investment Promotion Act

Thailand's FDI is regulated by the Investment Promotion Act. Foreign investors can register a company in Thailand to commence operations.

Singapore

Authority: Economic Development Board

Regulation: Significant Investment Review Act

Singapore provides a favorable FDI environment regulated by the Significant Investment Review Act. Investors can set up:

• Companies
• Brokerage accounts

Republic of Korea

Authority: Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy

Regulation: Foreign Investment Protection Act or Foreign Exchange Transaction Act

South Korea has robust FDI policies under the Foreign Investment Protection Act. Foreign investors must:

• Invest at least USD 74,000
• Acquire at least 10% shares of a Korean company
• Appoint an executive officer in the Korean company

Conclusion

Each country in Asia offers unique opportunities and regulatory environments for foreign investors. Understanding these differences is crucial for making informed investment decisions. India's dual-route system, Indonesia's minimum capital requirement, Taiwan's multiple investment channels, Vietnam's recent legal updates, China's focused investment areas, Bangladesh's long-standing investment protection act, Japan's open stock and mutual fund markets, Thailand's structured promotion act, Singapore's significant investment reviews, and South Korea's minimum investment and executive appointment requirements reflect the diverse approaches to FDI in the region. Investors must carefully consider these regulations to align their strategies with the most suitable investment destinations.

 

Article Compiled by:-

Gourav Saraf (Company Secretary)

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/gourav-saraf-bb953535_professionals-companysecretaries-practisingcompanysecretary-activity-7204499852578164736-a9tV?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

Disclaimer: Every effort has been made to avoid errors or omissions in this material in spite of this, errors may creep in. Any mistake, error or discrepancy noted may be brought to our notice which shall be taken care of in the next edition In no event the author shall be liable for any direct indirect, special or incidental damage resulting from or arising out of or in connection with the use of this information Many sources have been considered including Newspapers, Journals, Bare Acts, Case Materials , Charted Secretary, Research Papers etc.

Print