Can Regulation 37A OF SEBI LODR, 2015 affect the ease of doing business???
“Ease of doing business” has been the catchphrase of this decade isn’t it? But what is the reality of it? For finding out that lets see this one provision of SEBI LODR which challenges it….The regulation which I want to discuss here is “Regulation 37 A” of SEBI LODR, 2015.
WHAT IS THE REGULATION ABOUT??
37A Sale, lease or disposal of an undertaking outside Scheme of Arrangement.
(1) A listed entity carrying out sale, lease or otherwise disposal of the whole or substantially the whole of the undertaking of such entity or where it owns more than one undertaking, of the whole or substantially the whole of any of such undertakings, shall –(a) take prior approval of shareholders by way of special resolution;
Provided that such a special resolution shall be acted upon only if the votes cast by the public shareholders in favour of the resolution exceed the votes cast by such public shareholders against the resolution:
FIRST LET US UNDERSTAND, WHAT IS AN UNDERTAKING?
According to Section 180 of Companies Act, 2013
(1) The Board of Directors of a company shall exercise the following powers only with the consent of the company by a special resolution, namely:—
(a) to sell, lease or otherwise dispose of the whole or substantially the whole of the undertaking of the company or where the company owns more than one undertaking, of the whole or substantially the whole of any of such undertakings.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this clause,—
(i) “undertaking” shall mean an undertaking in which the investment of the company exceeds twenty per cent. of its net worth as per the audited balance sheet of the preceding financial year or an undertaking which generates twenty per cent. of the total income of the company during the previous financial year;
So we are clear on what an undertaking is.
NOW WHAT ARE THE SCENARIOS THIS REGULATION WILL BE APPLICABLE?
WHAT IS REGULATION 24 (5) & (6) ABOUT??
24(5) A listed entity shall not dispose of shares in its material subsidiary resulting in reduction of its shareholding (either on its own or together with other subsidiaries) to less than or equal to fifty percent or cease the exercise of control over the subsidiary without passing a special resolution in its General Meeting
24(6) Selling, disposing and leasing of assets amounting to more than twenty percent of the assets of the material subsidiary on an aggregate basis during a financial year shall require prior approval of shareholders by way of special resolution.
We have understood what is an undertaking, what is regulation 37A, what are the scenarios this becomes applicable. Now comes the real question, how does it affect the ease of doing business??
If you had paid attention to the above, you could have noticed the provision of the regulation which is the real challenge. The provision says the “special resolution shall be acted upon only if the votes cast by the public shareholders in favour of the resolution exceed the votes cast by such public shareholders against the resolution.” Which means the votes of promoter and promoter group is of no use to passing of such resolution.
Already we have seen in regulation 23(4) that “no related party shall vote to approve such resolutions whether the entity is a related party to the particular transaction or not”. But here even though we are not doing transaction with related party, the votes of promoter and promoter group are given but are of no use it.
Like this you should not think…..
Because there is another provision in that regulation which says “Provided further that no public shareholder shall vote on the resolution if he is a party, directly or indirectly, to such sale, lease or otherwise disposal of the whole or substantially the whole of the undertaking of the listed entity.”
No loopholes, nowhere to run or hide. The moral of this regulation is you need public support to run your business.
At the end, you might ask, so what is the answer to the question?? I just want to tell one thing…
Ease of business is like RCB winning the trophy, it can happen, but we don’t know when…
Thank you for your time…!!!
Here's a summary of the above article
Section |
Details |
Introduction |
Ease of doing business is a popular catchphrase of this decade. However, Regulation 37A of SEBI LODR, 2015 challenges this concept. |
Regulation 37A Overview |
Regulation 37A deals with the sale, lease, or disposal of an undertaking outside a scheme of arrangement. It requires a special resolution for such actions, with the condition that the resolution is only valid if the votes cast by public shareholders in favor exceed those against. |
Definition of Undertaking (Section 180 of CA, 2013) |
An undertaking is defined as one where the company’s investment exceeds 20% of its net worth or generates 20% of total income in the previous financial year. |
Applicable Scenarios |
1. Regulation 37A with Section 180 |
Regulation 24(5) & 24(6) Overview |
Regulation 24(5): Prohibits listed entities from disposing of shares in a material subsidiary that would reduce shareholding to 50% or less without a special resolution. |
Challenges to Ease of Doing Business |
The special resolution in Regulation 37A requires majority approval from public shareholders, excluding the votes of the promoter group. This challenges the ease of doing business, as companies may face difficulties in getting approval even for actions in the ordinary course of business. Hostile takeovers and public shareholder opposition can also create hurdles. |
Conclusion |
Regulation 37A emphasizes the need for public support to conduct business. This regulation complicates the ease of doing business, drawing a comparison to the unpredictability of RCB winning a trophy, indicating that ease of business may be possible, but it's uncertain when it will be achieved. |
"Unlock the Potential of Legal Expertise with LegalMantra.net - Your Trusted Legal Consultancy Partner”
Article Compiled by:-
~From the desk of CS Sharath
(LegalMantra.net Team)
Disclaimer: Every effort has been made to avoid errors or omissions in this material in spite of this, errors may creep in. Any mistake, error or discrepancy noted may be brought to our notice which shall be taken care of in the next edition In no event the author shall be liable for any direct indirect, special or incidental damage resulting from or arising out of or in connection with the use of this information Many sources have been considered including Newspapers, Journals, Bare Acts, Case Materials , Charted Secretary, Research Papers etc.