Resolving Bank Issues in India: The Banking Ombudsman Scheme

Introduction

A strong system for handling client complaints is essential in the complicated world of modern finance, where transactions occur quickly and complex financial products are common. In certain situations, banking ombudsmen intervene as unbiased mediators between clients and their financial service providers. Their function is not only crucial, but it also forms the basis of openness and confidence in the banking industry.

The Government of India made the decision to establish the quasi-judicial Banking Ombudsman in 2006 in order to facilitate the resolution of bank customers' complaints on specific services provided by the banks. In India, the Banking Ombudsman Scheme was first implemented in 1995 and underwent revisions in 2002. The Banking Ombudsman program of 2002 was superseded and replaced by the present program, which went into effect on January 1, 2006. Currently in effect is the Banking Ombudsman Scheme 2006 (as revised through July 1, 2017).

Why Do We Need Them?

In a sector as complex as banking, disagreements are unavoidable. Consumers may run into problems with unfair financing tactics, illegal transactions, service delays, and inaccurate product information, among other things. If there isn't a specific platform for discussing these issues, clients may feel powerless and lose trust in the banking industry. Banking ombudsmen play a vital role as a liaison between clients and financial institutions, making sure that complaints are taken seriously and addressed as soon as possible.

What do Ombudsmen in Banking Do?

Meaning of  Banking Ombudsmen

Banking ombudsmen are independent bodies appointed by regulatory authorities to resolve complaints from customers against banks and other financial institutions. They act as mediators, seeking amicable solutions to disputes between customers and their banks. These ombudsmen are typically seasoned professionals with expertise in banking and finance, ensuring a fair and knowledgeable approach to dispute resolution

Banking Ombudsman Scheme, 2006

Scope of the Scheme: The Reserve Bank of India revised the Banking Ombudsman Scheme in 2006 and expanded its scope to include credit card complaints, service charges levied without prior notice to the customer, and non-compliance with individual banks' fair practices codes. The scheme also addressed customer complaints regarding credit card complaints and deficiencies in service delivery, even by bank sales agents.

Application of the Scheme: All commercial banks, scheduled primary cooperative banks, and regional rural banks operating in India are covered by the scheme.

Finances: In contrast to the previous plan, the Reserve Bank, rather than the banks, provides funding and complete staffing for the new Banking Ombudsman plan.

The Complaint Process:. Complainants may submit their complaints in any format, including online, under the updated Banking Ombudsman Scheme.

Appeal: Bank customers may file an appeal with the Reserve Bank about the decisions made by the Banking Ombudsmen.

Forum for complaints: The 2006 scheme gives bank customers a place to voice their most frequent grievances against banks, such as those involving credit cards, service fees, promises made by bank sales representatives but not fulfilled by the banks, and service delivery delays.

New grievance areas: Customers of banks have the right to file complaints over nonpayment, excessive delays in payment, check collection for bills or remittances, and bank rejection of small denomination notes and coins or commission charges for such acceptance.

Procedure for filing complaint. 

Clause 9 of the Banking Ombudsman Scheme, 2006 lays down the procedure to file a complaint before the Banking Ombudsman as well as the conditions in which a complainant cannot approach the banking ombudsman.

1. Any person who has a grievance against a bank on any one or more of the grounds mentioned in the Scheme may, himself or through his authorized representative (other than an advocate), make a complaint to the Banking Ombudsman within whose jurisdiction the branch or office of the bank complained against is located. But the complaint arising out of the operations of credit cards, has to be filed before the Banking Ombudsman within whose territorial jurisdiction the billing address of the card holder is located and not the place where the bank concerned or the credit card processing unit is located.

2. The complaint in writing has to be duly signed by the complainant or his authorized representative. The complainant has to show the copies of the documents, which he proposes to rely upon and a declaration under Clause 9(3) of the scheme. He has to mention the following things in the complaint:

• the name and the address of the complainant,

• the name and address of the branch or office of the bank against which the complaint is made,

• the facts giving rise to the complaint,

• the nature and extent of the loss caused to the complainant, and

• The relief sought for.

The Banking Ombudsman also entertains complaints covered by this Scheme received by Central Government or Reserve Bank and forwarded to him for disposal.

Benefits for Customers

The presence of banking ombudsmen offers several benefits to customers. Firstly, it provides them with a recourse mechanism when they feel wronged or mistreated by their banks. This can help restore confidence in the banking system and encourage customers to engage more actively with financial services. Moreover, the ombudsman's intervention often leads to fair and equitable outcomes, ensuring that customers are not unfairly disadvantaged in their dealings with banks.

Benefits for Banks

While the primary focus of banking ombudsmen is to protect customer interests, their presence also benefits banks in several ways. Firstly, it helps banks identify and rectify systemic issues that may be causing widespread customer dissatisfaction. By addressing complaints promptly and fairly, banks can prevent escalations that could damage their reputation and incur regulatory penalties. Additionally, a transparent and impartial dispute resolution process can enhance customer trust and loyalty, ultimately benefiting the bank's bottom line.

Ground Of Complaint

A complaint may relate to following aspects including loans and advances alleging deficiency in banking or other services;

• Non-payment or inordinate delay in the payment or collection of cheques, drafts, bills etc;
• Non-acceptance, of small denomination notes tendered for any purpose, and for charging of commission in respect thereof;
• Non –  acceptance, without sufficient cause, of coins tendered and for charging of commission in respect thereof;
• Non-payment or delay in payment of inward remittances;
• Failure or delay to issue of drafts, pay orders or bankers’ cheques;
• Non-adherence to prescribed working hours;
• Failure to honour guarantee or letter of credit commitments;
• Failure / delay to provide a banking facility (other than loans) promised in writing by a bank or its direct selling agents;
• Delays, non-credit of proceeds to parties’ accounts, non-payment of deposit or non- observance of RBI directives, applicable to rate of interest on deposits in any savings, current or other a/c.
• Delays in receipt of export proceeds, handling of export bills, collections of bills etc., for exporters provided the said complaints pertain to the bank’s operations in India;
• Complaints from NRIs having a/c in India for their remittance from abroad, deposits and other bank related matters;
• Refusal to open deposit a/c without any valid reason for refusal;
• Levying of charges without adequate prior notice to the customer;
• Non-adherence by the bank or its subsidiaries to the instructions of RBI on ATM / Debit card operations or credit card operations;
• Non-disbursement or delay in disbursement of pension (to the extent the grievance can be attributed to the action on the part of the bank concerned, but not with regard to its employees)

While banking ombudsmen have made significant strides in addressing customer grievances, there is still room for improvement to further enhance their effectiveness and reach. Here are some key areas where efforts can be focused:

1. Accessibility and Awareness: Many customers may not be aware of the existence or functions of banking ombudsmen. Improving awareness through targeted outreach campaigns, educational materials, and collaboration with consumer advocacy groups can ensure that customers know where to turn when they encounter problems with their banks.

 

2. Digital Transformation: As banking services increasingly move online, it is essential for banking ombudsmen to adapt to the digital landscape. Investing in technology infrastructure and digital platforms can streamline the complaint filing process and enable faster resolution of disputes. Additionally, leveraging data analytics can help identify emerging trends and issues, allowing ombudsmen to proactively address systemic problems.

 

3. Capacity Building: Adequate resources and expertise are essential for banking ombudsmen to handle the growing volume and complexity of complaints. Investing in training programs for ombudsman staff and recruiting professionals with diverse skill sets can enhance their ability to effectively adjudicate disputes and provide quality service to customers.

 

4. Transparency and Accountability: Maintaining transparency in the ombudsman's operations and decision-making processes is crucial for building trust among customers and financial institutions alike. Publishing annual reports, highlighting key statistics and trends, and soliciting feedback from stakeholders can foster accountability and demonstrate the ombudsman's commitment to fair and impartial dispute resolution.

 

5. Collaboration with Stakeholders: Effective resolution of banking disputes often requires collaboration between the ombudsman, banks, regulators, and other stakeholders. Establishing regular communication channels and forums for dialogue can facilitate the exchange of information and best practices, leading to more efficient dispute resolution and systemic improvements in the banking sector.

 

Conclusion

In an era where trust and transparency are paramount, banking ombudsmen play a crucial role in safeguarding customer interests and maintaining the integrity of the banking system. By providing a fair and impartial forum for dispute resolution, they empower customers to voice their concerns and hold financial institutions accountable for their actions. Moving forward, it is imperative that regulators and stakeholders continue to support and strengthen the role of banking ombudsmen, ensuring that they remain effective guardians of customer rights in an ever-evolving financial landscape.

Unlock the Potential of Legal Expertise with LegalMantra.net - Your Trusted Legal Consultancy Partner”

Article Compiled by:-

Prerna Yadav

(LegalMantra.net Team)

Disclaimer: Every effort has been made to avoid errors or omissions in this material in spite of this, errors may creep in. Any mistake, error or discrepancy noted may be brought to our notice which shall be taken care of in the next edition In no event the author shall be liable for any direct indirect, special or incidental damage resulting from or arising out of or in connection with the use of this information Many sources have been considered including Newspapers, Journals, Bare Acts, Case Materials , Charted Secretary, Research Papers etc.

 

Print